
RELATIONSHIFTS: While I’m not out of the loop, this time I was quite obviously not “in” it, and when I recently found out about the G Shot, a shot that plumps up the volume in your urethral sponge, I was both saddened and appalled. All I can think of to say is “be afraid, be very afraid,” well, really that’s not all I can think of to say, but it’s a start. It’s not that I don’t think that a woman who really wants to feel her G Spot shouldn’t find a way to do so, it’s just that the G Shot is so not the way to go, and so not cool.
See, the G Spot is groovy, but it’s not the biggest deal in the world. I won’t argue with the fact that G Spot stimulation feels nice when it feels nice, but I love my clitoris way more than I will ever love my urethral sponge. So why some people are so G Spot focused that they’ll do anything to feel the deal is way beyond how I feel, but I understand that there are lots of people who don’t think like I do. There’s always been a lot of hype around getting off from his being inside of her without having to do any extra work to make it happen (re: playing with her clit). But that’s not the way it happens for more than half of the women out there, so I suggest that first and foremost if you’re a man who loves being with a woman (or maybe more than one woman) you learn a thing or two about the clit, and learn it quickly. And then when you learn to please her clitorally, you can start to experiment with the G Spot on your own time and give yourself plenty of time because you might need it. That means that the G Spot doesn’t always, or ever, work for some women, and that in order to fully figure out what works for any individual could take a mighty long time. The first (and one of the only times) I’ve ever experienced an orgasm without clitoral contact the whole process took well over an hour, and my wrist hurt afterwards (and I used one of those acrylic S shaped wands). In the end it wasn’t even any better, or any more special, than any of my other orgasms. So why man, why?
Man is why. The G Shot was designed by a dude, a male gynecologist, who wants to better his female patients, or maybe he just hoped to jump their bones after being the proud patentee of a shot that claims side effects including a higher level of arousal and a mental preoccupation with the G Spot. And once again a man (don’t get me wrong I love men. And even though I am not a man-hater, when it comes to female sexuality this always gets my goat) is telling women how to change how they feel, without knowing anything about what it feels like to be a woman (at least not in this lifetime)!
I don’t buy this G Shot, and I don’t want other “normal,” sexually active women to place too much emphasis on buying it either. Women confident in their own sexuality realize it’s not all that important to have to have G Spot orgasms if they’re not having them already. They know that the clitoris is the only organ we humanoids have that’s been designed for one reason and one reason only, and that’s pure, unadulterated pleasure. But when a guy wants to feel “like a real man” he invents the G Shot to help him do so, because maybe he hasn’t ever been able to please his women, and now he thinks by helping puff up her genitals he can find a way to please her better. And while I don’t think all guys think this way, I do think that most inexperienced men would look at the G Shot as a quick fix, and think that it could make them feel like a better lover, and therefore they might encourage their insecure wives to try it out. Remember if he satisfies her during sex, then he is the king of the jungle.
So what exactly is the G Shot besides something that makes me sad and itchy? It’s a shot that a doctor can administer to sexually active, “normal” women. It’s supposed to change how she feels about her G Spot. The patent-pending shot, which literally gets injected into her G Spot through the vagina, is a shot of manmade collagen (the collagen is called fascia), and again, it gets shot right into the top wall of her vagina. Even if it doesn’t hurt that much, why, oh why, would anyone do this?
According to the ahem, research, on the site in a trial run of “normal” women, 87% of them felt the better sex effects for up to four months after being shot in the heart of the matter. Which sounds fine and dandy, but still four months is four months and that’s not forever, and that means you’d have to get shot up again and again just to feel the rush, if indeed you aren’t one of the 13% that never felt the rush.
My vagina is my birth canal, a sacred place for certain sacred (and non-sacred) objects, and there’s only one type of prick that I’d like to have in there, at least for as long as I’m considered a “normal” woman myself. With risks that include infection, urinary retention, urethral injury and bleeding, (and not regular bleeding because of a regular cycle that requires the regular release of an egg) I am so out. You are who you are, and that’s got to be good enough. And if it’s not good enough then education is key, and education involves whatever you need to seek out your G Spot without the aid of a needle. Because you don’t need a needle to have better sex, all you really need information. Information like this information.
Posted by Jamye Waxman on January 19th, 2007 under Sexuality. Comments: 5 | EMail This Post
Comments
Comment from Cindy
Time: February 3, 2007, 7:51 pm
I think you need to open your mind. I have tried this procedure and it exceeds everything it has advertised.
Comment from Amber
Time: February 25, 2007, 6:20 pm
I think it is great that you have written this Jayme! So many women are looking for a quick fix, along with the men (ahem) and they lose sight of real reality. Funny how only ONE doctor is doing this. Believe me, If it worked….everyone would be buying it (4 times a year and he would be so rich he wouldn’t need his own tv show). Not to mention that he would be able to mass market it because everyone’s Momma’s cousin would want a puffy G spot.
Comment from Omar
Time: March 28, 2007, 9:32 am
I find your article sadning. Who cares who invented the G-Shot, man or woman? If it helps someone feel better about themselves then it has its place. Were makeup, tampons, pantyhoses, skirts, and vibrators all invented by women? Unfortunately men have more opportunities than women in this world. But that is just the way it has been. A helpful product should not be discarded due to the sex of its creator. Women have the responsability to seek out their orgasm. If they have a partner that is not a good lover but they love them anyways why not try some enhancement. Being good in bed may be very difficult for some guys or maybe impossible. So if this shot makes a good man great by filling in a gap in a relationship then I say get it 4 times a year! You might consider getting it aswell. You won’t have to masturbate as long with your wand and you’ll have 2 very pleasurable spots not just one. In that regard women are very lucky by the way. But then again, i can’t comment on women’s body’s because i don’t have a vagina.
Comment from Al
Time: May 18, 2007, 12:37 pm
Jayme, agreed. If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. There is nothing wrong with female sexuality, and frankly, there are *huge* health benefits to the fact that women are able to orgasm without penetration.
This shot is clearly *not* designed to improve het women’s pleasure as much as it is to make sex easier for het men (really, it’s beyond obvious that these were the motives).
As for the bizarre assertion that, rather than men learning how to be good partners in bed, that women should shell out a couple thousand dollars for a medical procedure, get a clue.
There are plenty of men who are good lovers, and plenty more who are capable of learning how (seriously, it’s no big mystery). Women already know how to please themselves. Omar, it is neither difficult nor impossible, all it takes are listening skills and respect for your partner.
To highlight just how bizarre the support behind this shot is, just replace women with men and g-spot with male tongue. Somehow no one would think to promote something that ridiculous (not to mention insulting to male sexuality!)
Funny how no one has promoted creating an erogenous zone on men’s tongues so they can experience orgasm while giving oral sex… women would love it, and there would be no risk of pregnancy!
Comment from Bill Compton
Time: June 4, 2007, 1:17 pm
Hi Jim. Photos i received. Thanks


Write a comment